Skip to content
UCU Faculty of LawNaSvitlo
Support usUAEN
Back to the library
International Criminal CourtThe HagueWARRANTS OF 17 MARCH 2023 · 5 MARCH 2024 · 24 JUNE 2024updated 21/08/2026

Situation in Ukraine

SITUATION IN UKRAINE, ICC-01/22 – INVESTIGATION AND WARRANTS OF ARREST ISSUED BY PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II

On this page

Case at a glance

SituationUkraine
SeatThe Hague
ScopeCrimes on Ukraine's territory since 21 Nov 2013
Warrants17 Mar 2023 · 5 Mar 2024 · 24 Jun 2024

The International Criminal Court is investigating war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide on the territory of Ukraine since 2013. Its judges have issued six arrest warrants: for Putin and Lvova-Belova over the deportation of Ukrainian children, and for four top military commanders over the missile campaign against the power grid. None of this is a verdict: a warrant means reasonable grounds to believe, and the ICC can only try a person it has in custody.

Timeline

  • no later than 26 Feb 2014JurisdictionOn the ICC's assessment, an armed conflict is already under way

Jurisdiction in the general situation

Ukraine was not a State Party to the Rome Statute, but it has twice exercised its prerogatives to accept the Court's jurisdiction over alleged crimes under the Rome Statute occurring on its territory, pursuant to article 12(3) of the Statute.

The first declaration lodged by the Government of Ukraine accepted ICC jurisdiction with respect to alleged crimes committed on Ukrainian territory from 21 November 2013 to 22 February 2014.

The second declaration extended this time period on an open-ended basis to encompass ongoing alleged crimes committed throughout the territory of Ukraine from 20 February 2014 onwards.

On 25 October 2024, Ukraine deposited its instrument of ratification of the Rome Statute, which officially entered into force on 1 January 2025.

On 28 February 2022, the ICC Prosecutor announced he would seek authorisation to open an investigation into the Situation in Ukraine, on the basis of the Office's earlier conclusions arising from its preliminary examination, and encompassing any new alleged crimes falling within the jurisdiction of the Court.

On 1 March 2022, the Office received a State Party referral from the Republic of Lithuania.

On 2 March 2022, the following coordinated group of States Parties submitted a joint referral
  • Republic of Albania
  • Commonwealth of Australia
  • Republic of Austria
  • Kingdom of Belgium
  • Republic of Bulgaria
  • Canada
  • Republic of Colombia
  • Republic of Costa Rica
  • Republic of Croatia
  • Republic of Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Kingdom of Denmark
  • Republic of Estonia
  • Republic of Finland
  • Republic of France
  • Georgia
  • Federal Republic of Germany
  • Hellenic Republic
  • Hungary
  • Republic of Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Republic of Italy
  • Republic of Latvia
  • Principality of Liechtenstein
  • Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
  • Republic of Malta
  • New Zealand
  • Kingdom of Norway
  • Kingdom of the Netherlands
  • Republic of Poland
  • Republic of Portugal
  • Romania
  • Slovak Republic
  • Republic of Slovenia
  • Kingdom of Spain
  • Kingdom of Sweden
  • Swiss Confederation
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

On 2 March 2022, the Prosecutor announced he had proceeded to open an investigation into the Situation in Ukraine on the basis of the referrals received.

In accordance with the overall jurisdictional parameters conferred through these referrals, and without prejudice to the focus of the investigation, the scope of the situation encompasses any past and present allegations of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide committed on any part of the territory of Ukraine by any person from 21 November 2013 onwards.

On 11 March 2022, the Prosecutor confirmed that two additional States, Japan and North Macedonia, have referred the Situation in Ukraine to the Office. On 21 March 2022, Montenegro further informed the Office of its decision to join the group State Party referral, and on 1 April 2022, the Republic of Chile joined the group State Party referral of the situation.

On 17 March 2023, ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II issued warrants of arrest for two individuals in the context of the situation in Ukraine: Mr Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, President of the Russian Federation, and Ms Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, Commissioner for Children's Rights in the Office of the President of the Russian Federation.

The Court's position

Based on the Prosecution's applications of 22 February 2023, Pre-Trial Chamber II considered that there are reasonable grounds to believe that each suspect bears responsibility for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation, in prejudice of Ukrainian children.

On 5 March 2024, ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II issued warrants of arrest for two individuals in the context of the situation in Ukraine: Mr Sergei Ivanovich Kobylash, a Lieutenant General in the Russian Armed Forces who at the relevant time was the Commander of the Long-Range Aviation of the Aerospace Force, and Mr Viktor Nikolayevich Sokolov, an Admiral in the Russian Navy, who at the relevant time was the Commander of the Black Sea Fleet.

The Court's position

Based on the Prosecution's applications of 2 February 2024, Pre-Trial Chamber II considered that there are reasonable grounds to believe that each suspect bears responsibility for the war crime of directing attacks at civilian objects, the war crime of causing excessive incidental harm to civilians or damage to civilian objects, and the crime against humanity of inhumane acts.

In addition on 24 June 2024, Pre-Trial Chamber II issued warrants of arrest for two more individuals, Mr Sergei Kuzhugetovich Shoigu and Mr Valery Vasilyevich Gerasimov, in the context of the situation in Ukraine for alleged international crimes committed from at least 10 October 2022 until at least 9 March 2023.

Arrest warrants

Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin

Born on 7 October 1952, President of the Russian Federation. Allegedly responsible for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation (under articles 8(2)(a)(vii) and 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute). The crimes were allegedly committed in Ukrainian occupied territory at least from 24 February 2022.

The Court's position

There are reasonable grounds to believe that Putin bears individual criminal responsibility for the aforementioned crimes, (i) for having committed the acts directly, jointly with others and/or through others (article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute), and (ii) for his failure to exercise control properly over civilian and military subordinates who committed the acts, or allowed for their commission, and who were under his effective authority and control, pursuant to superior responsibility (article 28(b) of the Rome Statute).

Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova

Born on 25 October 1984, Commissioner for Children's Rights in the Office of the President of the Russian Federation. Allegedly responsible for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation (under articles 8(2)(a)(vii) and 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute). The crimes were allegedly committed in Ukrainian occupied territory at least from 24 February 2022.

The Court's position

There are reasonable grounds to believe that Ms Lvova-Belova bears individual criminal responsibility for the aforementioned crimes, for having committed the acts directly, jointly with others and/or through others (article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute).

Sergei Ivanovich Kobylash

Born on 1 April 1965, Lieutenant General in the Russian Armed Forces, who at the relevant time was the Commander of the Long-Range Aviation of the Aerospace Force. Allegedly responsible for the war crime of directing attacks at civilian objects (article 8(2)(b)(ii) of the Rome Statute) and the war crime of causing excessive incidental harm to civilians or damage to civilian objects (article 8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute), and the crime against humanity of inhumane acts under article 7(1)(k) of the Rome Statute.

The Court's position

There are reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Kobylash bears individual criminal responsibility for the aforementioned crimes for (i) having committed the acts jointly and/or through others (article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute), (ii) ordering the commission of the crimes, and/or (iii) for their failure to exercise proper control over the forces under their command (article 28(a) of the Rome Statute).

Viktor Nikolayevich Sokolov

Born 4 April 1962, Admiral in the Russian Navy, who at the relevant time was the Commander of the Black Sea Fleet. Allegedly responsible for the war crime of directing attacks at civilian objects (article 8(2)(b)(ii) of the Rome Statute) and the war crime of causing excessive incidental harm to civilians or damage to civilian objects (article 8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute), and the crime against humanity of inhumane acts under article 7(1)(k) of the Rome Statute.

The Court's position

There are reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Sokolov bears individual criminal responsibility for the aforementioned crimes for (i) having committed the acts jointly and/or through others (article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute), (ii) ordering the commission of the crimes, and/or (iii) for their failure to exercise proper control over the forces under their command (article 28(a) of the Rome Statute).

Sergei Kuzhugetovich Shoigu

Born on 21 May 1955, Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation at the time of the alleged conduct. Allegedly responsible for the war crime of directing attacks at civilian objects (article 8(2)(b)(ii) of the Rome Statute) and the war crime of causing excessive incidental harm to civilians or damage to civilian objects (article 8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute), and the crime against humanity of inhumane acts under article 7(1)(k) of the Rome Statute.

The Court's position

There are reasonable grounds to believe he bears individual criminal responsibility for the aforementioned crimes for (i) having committed the acts jointly and/or through others (article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute), (ii) ordering the commission of the crimes (article 25(3)(b) of the Rome Statute), and/or (iii) for their failure to exercise proper control over the forces under their command (article 28 of the Rome Statute).

Valery Vasilyevich Gerasimov

Born on 8 September 1955, Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and First Deputy Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation at the time of the alleged conduct. Allegedly responsible for the war crime of directing attacks at civilian objects (article 8(2)(b)(ii) of the Rome Statute) and the war crime of causing excessive incidental harm to civilians or damage to civilian objects (article 8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute), and the crime against humanity of inhumane acts under article 7(1)(k) of the Rome Statute.

The Court's position

There are reasonable grounds to believe he bears individual criminal responsibility for the aforementioned crimes for (i) having committed the acts jointly and/or through others (article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute), (ii) ordering the commission of the crimes (article 25(3)(b) of the Rome Statute), and/or (iii) for their failure to exercise proper control over the forces under their command (article 28 of the Rome Statute).

Case geography

Key rulings on the law

Jurisdiction without membership
A non-party State can accept the Court's jurisdiction by an art. 12(3) declaration. Ukraine's two declarations (2014, 2015) opened its whole territory to the ICC from 21 November 2013 – years before ratification.
Head-of-state immunity
Personal immunities are not opposable before the ICC (art. 27). In the Mongolia decision of 24 October 2024 the Chamber reaffirmed that the duty to arrest does not bend to official capacity.
What follows when a warrant is not executed
Article 87(7): the Chamber records the failure and refers the matter to the Assembly of States Parties through the Presidency. There is no other lever – the ICC has no police of its own. In this situation there are two such findings already: Mongolia (24 October 2024, ICC-01/22-90) and Tajikistan (19 March 2026, ICC-01/22-143).
Peace talks do not suspend a warrant
The article 97 decision of 9 June 2026: there is no peace-talks exception to the duty to arrest, and a State cannot suspend a warrant on its own initiative. A conference formally convened by the United Nations makes UN Charter obligations relevant, but it is the Court, not the host State, that weighs them. The one route to suspension is article 16 – a deferral at the request of the UN Security Council, which is not a State's to ask for.
"Reasonable grounds to believe"
The evidentiary standard for a warrant (art. 58) – lower than that for conviction. A warrant opens the road to arrest and trial; it decides nothing about guilt.
Two theories of the case
The Prosecution has built two lines: the deportation of children (the political leadership, wave 1) and the campaign against the grid (the military chain, from operational commanders up to the Defence Minister and General Staff, waves 2–3).
The jurisdictional limit: aggression
The ICC cannot reach the crime of aggression here, because Russia is not a party to the Statute. That is why Ukraine and the Council of Europe signed the Special Tribunal agreement on 25 June 2025.

Two lines of accusation

Two lines of accusation, each with a vertical of its own. Over the children the Court reached the head of state; over the grid, the Defence Minister and the Chief of the General Staff. No warrant names the head of state for the strikes on the grid. Each warrant is the Chamber's finding of "reasonable grounds to believe", not a verdict; press a name for the articles charged.

Deportation of children

Deportation and unlawful transfer of children from occupied areas of Ukraine to Russia, at least from 24 February 2022. The Court reached the head of state.

01Head of state
02Presidential office

Strikes on the power grid

The missile campaign against electric infrastructure nationwide, at least 10.10.2022 – 09.03.2023. The Court reached the Defence Minister and the Chief of the General Staff.

01Defence Minister and General Staff
02Operational commanders

Figures from outside the Court

Children in the "Children of War" database19,546+
Of those, returned1,859

9.5% of 19,546+the rest – still not

deported or forcibly transferred

as of December 2025

ombudspersons' estimates150,000–300,000

The warrants state no numbers. These figures come from the official "Children of War" database, Human Rights Watch and government reporting; sources at the foot of the page. · as of 21 August 2026

Sources and commentary

Official court documents

  1. ICC official document
  2. Second declaration under article 12(3) (8 September 2015)International Criminal Court · 8 September 2015
    ICC official document
  3. Prosecutor's statement on referrals by Japan and North MacedoniaKarim A.A. Khan KC · International Criminal Court · 11 March 2022
    ICC official document
  4. State Party referral – JapanInternational Criminal Court · 2022
    ICC official document
  5. State Party referral – North MacedoniaInternational Criminal Court · 2022
    ICC official document
  6. State Party referral – MontenegroInternational Criminal Court · 21 March 2022
    ICC official document
  7. State Party referral – ChileInternational Criminal Court · 1 April 2022
    ICC official document
  8. ICC official document
  9. ICC official document
  10. ICC official document
  11. ICC official document
  12. ICC official document
  13. Decision on the non-compliance of Mongolia (ICC-01/22, full text)Pre-Trial Chamber II · International Criminal Court · 24 October 2024
    ICC official document
  14. ICC official document
  15. ICC official document
  16. Decision on the consultations requested under article 97 of the Statute (Situation in Ukraine)Pre-Trial Chamber II · International Criminal Court · 9 June 2026
    ICC official document
  17. treaty text
  18. ICC welcomes Ukraine as a new State PartyInternational Criminal Court · January 2025
    ICC official document

Research and commentary

  1. news / insight
  2. news / insight
  3. The ICC's Arrest Warrant Against Putin: A Grenade Against Peace in Ukraine?Andreas Chorakis · Harvard International Law Journal · November 2023
    journal article
  4. blog post
  5. Tajikistan's failure to arrest Vladimir Putin undermines the fight against impunityCoalition for the International Criminal Court · 16 October 2025
    news / insight
  6. Putin's Arrest Warrant, Immunity & the International Criminal CourtResearch Society of International Law · 2023
    blog post
  7. The ICC Goes Straight to the Top: Arrest Warrant Issued for PutinRebecca Hamilton · Just Security · 17 March 2023
    blog post
  8. Putin Arrest Warrant: International Law and Perceptions of Double StandardsChidi Anselm Odinkalu, Sharon Nakandha · Opinio Juris · 27 March 2023
    blog post
  9. blog post
  10. blog post
  11. news / insight
  12. news / insight
  13. blog post
  14. blog post
  15. preprint / repository
  16. preprint / repository
  17. news / insight
  18. blog post
  19. Ukraine becomes the 125th State Party to the ICC Rome StatuteCoalition for the International Criminal Court · 1 January 2025
    news / insight
  20. journal article
  21. How the ICC's Warrant for Putin Could Impact the Ukraine WarUnited States Institute of Peace · March 2023
    news / insight
  22. New ICC Warrants Issued for Ukraine CrimesHuman Rights Watch · 26 June 2024
    news / insight
  23. blog post
  24. news / insight
  25. news / insight
  26. news / insight
  27. news / insight
  28. news / insight
  29. news / insight
  30. The ICC, Arrest Warrants, and Peace NegotiationsMiles Jackson · EJIL: Talk! · 18 August 2026
    news / insight
© 2026 the Louis Sohn Research Centre, UCU. Materials – CC BY 4.0.Privacy policyTerms of use